Application analytics
Sprint-to-Outcome Reconciliation
Rebuild a disputed reporting window from raw application history, deploy markers, and work-item continuity so the KPI review rests on evidence.
HK$31,000 · 3-week study
KPI reviews stall when charts disagree about when users felt change. Timezone mishandling, identity merges, and missing deploy tags invent cliffs that never happened in the product.
This study rebuilds the reporting window from raw event history for one agreed sprint or release range, checks work-item continuity across platforms, and tests early-session behaviours against quality spikes.
You leave with a corrected timeline, a list of artefacts to stop celebrating, and a reusable outline your analysts can maintain after we leave.
Typically included
- Raw-history timeline rebuild
- Work-item continuity checks
- Artefact shortlist
- Analyst handoff outline